TRIP REPORT- Copenhagen, Feb 28, 1999
Purpose: To brief the Greenlandic and Copenhagen Authorities
on ISR facility status and potential rocket campaign
Meeting: Annual Operations Meeting for US Research in Greenland
Submitted: Jeff Thayer March 15, 1999
Attendees:
David Mulenex, Regional Counselor, US Embassy
John Grant, Environmental Attache, US Embassy
Paul Thorn, Science Attache, US Embassy
Marijane England, Polar Ice Coring Office
Col Pritchard, Air National Guard
Major Paul Shepard, Air National Guard
Major Shawn Cloussier, Air National Guard
Major Bob Bullock, Air National Guard
Allan Pedersen, Kangerlussuaq Airport Manager
Jorgen Taagholt, DPC Science liason officer
Morten Meldgaard, Director DPC
Poul Henrik Sorensen, DPC deputy director
Hauge Andersson, DPC
Knud Rosing, Danish Civil Aviation Administration
Allan Pedersen, Kangerlussuaq Airport Manager
Ole Samsing, Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Adam Worm, Greenland Home Rule Office
Mogens Holm, Greenland Home Rule
T. Kornerup, Danish Defense Command
Peter Stehr, Department of Defense
Erik Mayntz, Greenland Command
Jonny Parnset, Greenland Command
I traveled to Copenhagen February 28 to brief Danish and
Greenlandic officials on the status of the Sondrestrom incoherent scatter
radar facility as well as the potential for a rocket campaign in Kangerlussuaq.
This meeting is an annual operations meeting for US research performed
in Greenland. The attendees are the very people we need to inform and will
work with later if the rocket campaign gets funded. Everyone was very positive
about the rocket campaign concept with no immediate issues. Of course,
the civil aviation guys would like to work very closely with us considering
some air space issues. One warning from Allan Pedersen, local airport manager,
is that the summer months can be quite crowded and supporting 50 people
with housing and vehicles could be difficult. This depends on when in the
summer the campaign occurs. Also, the Air National Guard out of New York
flies routinely to Sondrestrom for logistical support of US activities
in Greenland. They expressed a great deal of interest in shipping the NASA
rockets and other materials needed for the campaign. They can be much cheaper
than commercial shipping and they can usually be more helpful with hazardous
materials. This could be a real time and money saver for NASA. Also, they
would like to know if we want to recover payloads. If considered, they
would like to be part of that too and we might want to look into what it
would cost if that is something of interest.
Overall, we are on the right track with the proper authorities,
Danish, Greenlandic, and US state department, well informed. It was agreed
that no additional meetings were necessary until the decision by NASA on
the proposal is made, sometime in January 2000. The next step is to write
the winning proposals.